Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Supply Corp. v. Wotola Royalty Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1942No. 7901PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

On January 7, 1935, Wotola Royalty Corporation and six other parties, who were the owners of the mineral estate in the east one-half of the west one-half of the northeast one-fourth of Section 45, Block 24, H. & G. N. Ry. Co. Survey in Wheeler County, Texas, entered into a written lease and drilling contract with one James G. Cloud. By the terms of this instrument the above-described land was leased to Cloud “for the sole and only purpose of mining and drilling for oil and gas, and of laying pipe lines and of building tanks, power stations, and structures thereon to produce, save and .take…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oriental Hotel Company v. GriffithsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gugenheim v. Dallas Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Wotola Royalty Corp. v. Bethlehem Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Abella v. Knight Oil Tools, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  2. Kelly v. HeimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Schneider v. Delwood Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Ammann v. Daniel Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v. PennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API