Estrada v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
The question before us is whether an alien whose state conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia was expunged under state law, but who violated the terms of his probation before expungement, would have been eligible for relief under the Federal First Offender Act (FFOA), 18 U.S.C. § 3607(a). Generally, expungement of convictions under state rehabilitative statutes does not negate the immigration consequences of the conviction. Notwithstanding this, an alien is not removable if — had he been prosecuted in federal court — he would have qualified for relief under the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Minh Duc Luu-Le v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- MANRIQUEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
- Jesus Ramon Cardenas-Uriarte v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Vacilio Aguiluz-Arellano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- MARTINEZ ESPINOZABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- Moones Mellouli v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Pedro Madrigal-Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cesar Torres Ornelas v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Emilio Hernandez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.