Legal Opinion
MARTINEZ ESPINOZA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2009No. ID 3661PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 118
(BIA 2009) Interim Decision #3661 Matter of Lael MARTINEZ ESPINOZA, Respondent File A073 829 129 - Bloomington, Minnesota Decided November 4, 2009 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An alien may be rendered inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (2006), on the basis of a conviction for possession or use of drug paraphernalia. (2) An alien who is inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Act based on a drug…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jose Reyes Ruiz-Vidal v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Minh Duc Luu-Le v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Gomez-Sanchez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Borrome v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Ramiro Enrique Rojas v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.