Legal Opinion

Aron v. U-Haul Co. of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2006No. B181756PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

—Leonard E.Aron appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of U-Haul Company of California and U-Haul International, Inc., in his consumer class action alleging that U-Haul’s refueling charges and practices violate the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code 1 section 1750 et seq. (CLRA) and the California unfair competition law, Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. (UCL). We conclude that Aron has alleged facts sufficient to state a cause of action under the UCL and section 1770, subdivision (a)(5) of the CLRA. Accordingly, we reverse.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Rubio v. Capital One BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API