Legal Opinion

American Bankers' Ins. Co. v. O'Neal

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1933No. 6 Div. 453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The complaint was originally in two counts. Count 1 declared on a contract of insurance, and count 2 was the common count declaring on an account due July 20, 1932. Demurrer to this complaint was sustained. Plaintiff was allowed to file an amended complaint consisting of counts 3, 5, and 6, to which and to each count thereof the defendant filed demurrer. These demurrers were overruled and defendant filed plea of the general issue in short by consent, etc.

There are numerous assignments of error, but appellant only presents in its brief the rulings of the court on the demurrers,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. American Bankers' Ins. Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Turnipseed v. BurtonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Pan Coastal Life Insurance Company v. MaloneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. City of Birmingham v. LynchAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Bates v. TurneyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. City of Birmingham v. LynchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API