City of Birmingham v. Lynch
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The appeal in this case is on the record, and raises the question as to the correctness of the ruling of the Court on demurrers to the complaint.
The complaint as originally filed consisted of four counts. Subsequently, the complaint was amended by the addition of seven counts designated “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F” and “G”, and counts one to four, inclusive, were withdrawn.
Each of the amended counts stated separate and distinct causes of action, each claiming damages for an overflow of water occurring on a date different from any date named in any of the other counts of the complaint as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henderson v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Barrett v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Grambs v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- First Nat. Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- City of Birmingham v. JeffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trammell v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- White v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Brush v. RountreeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hinkle v. LattaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948