Snook v. Pearsall
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Bill for an accounting. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcG-rath, J.
Defendant Ira S. Pearsall, in 1871, made a distribution of practically all of his property. He assigned certain notes and mortgages to the complainant, his daughter, in her own right, and certain other notes and mortgages to her in trust for her two daughters. At the same time, he deeded a farm valued at $10,000, and assigned certain other notes and mortgages, to the defendant Dwight E. Pearsall, his son. It was agreed between the parties that the father should retain in his possession all of the notes and mortgages so assigned, collect both interest and principal, re-invest the principal,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adams v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Gallow v. BrandtMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Powers v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hinkley v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Childs v. PellettMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Burnham v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.