Hyatt v. . Ingalls
New York Court of Appeals
Cboss-appeals from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made May Y, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee appointed in pursuance of an interlocutory judgment herein, which interlocutory judgment was modified and affirmed as modified by an order of the General Term, made December 3,1883, which order was also brought up for review.
Read the full summary
Cboss-appeals from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made May Y, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee appointed in pursuance of an interlocutory judgment herein, which interlocutory judgment was modified and affirmed as modified by an order of the General Term, made December 3,1883, which order was also brought up for review. The action Avas founded upon alleged rights secured to the plaintiff by letters patent of the United States of date August 37,1867, and reissued August…
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The defendants’ appeal goes to the foundation of the action. The plaintiffs appeal has relation only to the subject of the direction given for the accounting of the defendants. The plaintiff, by her complaint, referred to and set forth the granting to her of the letters patent of 1867, the reissuing of them in 1878 and in September, 1881, the agreements with the defendants and the license to them to make illuminating basements and basement extensions under such patent, and alleged that they did sell such work and render accounts quarterly up to November 1,1881; that they had not paid…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Victory Bottle Capping Mach. Co. v. O. & J. Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Herzog v. . HeymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Mark v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Waterman v. . ShipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.