United States v. Ellis
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentEffron, Judge
The lead opinion concludes that appellant’s confession was voluntary as a matter of law. The lead further concludes that the confession may be relied upon to render harmless any error resulting from the failure of the military judge to provide an appropriate instruction regarding the destruction of important evidence. I respectfully disagree. The focus in the lead opinion on the admissibility ruling of the military judge fails to take into account the difference between: (1) the role of the military judge in determining admissibility of a confession as a matter of law, and (2) the role of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.