Legal Opinion

Benesowitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has asked us to decide how Insurance Law § 3234 (a) (2) affects an employee’s eligibility to receive benefits under the employer’s group disability plan when the disability is caused by a preexisting medical condition. We conclude that the statute allows insurers to toll benefits during the first 12 months of coverage, but does not permit them to impose an absolute bar to coverage for disabilities stemming from preexisting conditions and arising during that 12-month period.

Plaintiff Mitchell Benesowitz…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Marvin Pulvers v. First Unum Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cattaraugus-Little Valley Cent. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. Benesowitz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Nitkewicz v. Lincoln Life & Annuity Co. of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  4. In re the Arbitration between Johnson & Trustee for the Casaburi FamilyNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Benesowitz v. Met. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API