Legal Opinion

Beckner v. Kelpsch

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9713PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an appeal by certain legatees from the order settling final account and directing final distribution of the estate of Christine M. Kelpsch, deceased. There is no dispute as to the account itself. The dispute is as to the terms of the decree of distribution. The court held one-half of the estate to be community property and to belong to the husband, Joseph A. Kelpsch, he and Ellen C. Moline, née Johnson, being respectively executor and executrix under said will. The effect of this holding is to give appellants as legatees only one-half of what they would otherwise receive from said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Stevens v. Superior Court of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Estate of FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API