Trujillo v. Berry
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
Defendant Suds-Z Car Wash (Suds-Z) appeals the trial court’s amended order dismissing its cross-claim for failure to state a claim for relief. See SCRA 1986, 1-012(B)(6). The cross-claim for indemnification arose from an action brought by plaintiff, Angela Trujillo, against defendants Suds-Z, H & P Equipment Company (H & P), and Gayle Price, H & P’s employee, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered at a commercial car wash. Plaintiff claims that car wash equipment sold by H & P and installed by Price fell from the ceiling at the car wash and struck her head.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. Introspect Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Brooks v. Beech Aircraft Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Baxter Ex Rel. Estate of Baxter v. NoceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Consol. Vista Hills LitigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.