Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. Berry

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1987No. 8712PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRUMAN, Judge.

Defendant Suds-Z Car Wash (Suds-Z) appeals the trial court’s amended order dismissing its cross-claim for failure to state a claim for relief. See SCRA 1986, 1-012(B)(6). The cross-claim for indemnification arose from an action brought by plaintiff, Angela Trujillo, against defendants Suds-Z, H & P Equipment Company (H & P), and Gayle Price, H & P’s employee, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered at a commercial car wash. Plaintiff claims that car wash equipment sold by H & P and installed by Price fell from the ceiling at the car wash and struck her head.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. Introspect Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brooks v. Beech Aircraft Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Baxter Ex Rel. Estate of Baxter v. NoceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Consol. Vista Hills LitigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API