Milledgeville Banking Company v. Carr
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
The defendant’s special demurrers, attacking one paragraph of the plaintiff’s petition, a're neither argued nor insisted upon and are treated as having- been abandoned.
The defendant’s general demurrer was based solely on the ground that the petition set forth no cause of action and, accordingly; did not reach the question argued in defendant’s brief that the petition was ambiguous in that it did not clearly show whether the plaintiff was seeking a recovery ex contractu or ex delicto. See Ward v. Nance, 102 Ga. App. 201 (1) (115 SE2d 781), and citations.
While a bank may set off…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlanta National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Aiken v. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Ward v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Hilton v. Jesup Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fidelity National Bank v. KnellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- American Express Co. v. VarnedoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974