Legal Opinion

Milledgeville Banking Company v. Carr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1961No. 39117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The defendant’s special demurrers, attacking one paragraph of the plaintiff’s petition, a're neither argued nor insisted upon and are treated as having- been abandoned.

The defendant’s general demurrer was based solely on the ground that the petition set forth no cause of action and, accordingly; did not reach the question argued in defendant’s brief that the petition was ambiguous in that it did not clearly show whether the plaintiff was seeking a recovery ex contractu or ex delicto. See Ward v. Nance, 102 Ga. App. 201 (1) (115 SE2d 781), and citations.

While a bank may set off…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atlanta National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Aiken v. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Ward v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Hilton v. Jesup Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity National Bank v. KnellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. American Express Co. v. VarnedoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API