Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Bank of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 5, 1960No. 37838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The action under consideration sounding in tort, the issue before this court as it was before the trial court on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is not whether the bank, as against a proper defense by the judgment debtor, would be entitled to retain the proceeds of the bank account withdrawn by it from the debtor’s account, but whether in acting as it did under the facts then existing it committed a legal wrong against the debtor by withdrawing the funds in question from the deposit. To decide this question involves a consideration of the purposes and procedures…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Howell v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. In re PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1924
  4. Bank of Lawrenceville v. Rockmore & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. W. C. Caye & Co. v. Milledgeville Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waterfield Mortgage Co. v. Cassi (In Re Cassi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  2. Ingram v. LIBERTY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Atlanta Area Broadcasting, Inc. v. James Brown Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Design Spectrum, Inc. v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Hickman v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API