Legal Opinion

People v. Crosby

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1956No. Crim. 3139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

The Grand Jury of the County of San Mateo filed a 36-count indictment against appellant William P. Crosby charging him with 18 violations of Penal Code, section 424, subdivision 1, and 18 violations of Penal Code, section 424, subdivision 2. Appellant pleaded “Not Guilty” to all counts of the indictment. After a jury trial appellant was found guilty of violating Penal Code, section 424, subdivision 1 as charged in 18 of the counts and not guilty of the charges of violating subdivision 2 of that section. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied. This appeal is taken from the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Estate of McMillinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. ShowalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. MoultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Saltares v. KristovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Center for Public Interest Law v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API