Legal Opinion

State v. Stallings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 218PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeyiN, C. J.

The power of a court, in proper case, to suspend judgment on conviction of a criminal offense for a reasonable length of time, conditioned upon continued obedience to the law, is well recognized in this jurisdiction, and frequently exercised in order to carry out the more humane concept of the purpose of punishment for crime. S. v. Tripp, 168 N.C. 150, 83 S.E. 630; S. v. Wilson, 216 N.C. 130, 4 S.E. 2d 440; S. v. Gibson, 233 N.C. 691 (698), 65 S.E. 2d 508; G.S. 15-200. The propriety of suspending the sentence, ordinarily, is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial judge. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. State v. . TrippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API