Legal Opinion

Ginnery v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1983No. 12776PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Appellant filed motions under Rule 27.26, seeking to vacate sentences for rape1 and sodomy.2 The trial court denied the motions without a hearing. See Rule 27.26(e).

Appellant contends that a hearing should have been held on his motions as he alleged facts showing that he did not receive a fair trial because the trial court did not order a mental examination to determine his fitness to stand trial and his trial counsel failed to have him “timely and properly examined” to determine that fitness.

Appellant was examined on August 24, 1979, by a psychiatrist pursuant to an order of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. GinneryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. GinneryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Simpson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. SkeltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Liebeck v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API