Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1985No. 13872PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

By motion under Rule 27.26 movant sought to vacate a conviction and sentence for selling marijuana. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss movant’s motion. The trial court sustained a portion of respondent’s motion to dismiss and made “conclusions of law relating to the order of court dismissing portions of movant’s motion”. After an evidentiary hearing the trial court denied the remainder of movant’s motion. Movant appeals.

Appellate review is to determine whether the trial court’s findings, conclusions, and judgment are clearly erroneous. Rule 27.-26(j). “The trial court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MoonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Murphy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Huffman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ShaferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Holman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Bannister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. TildenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Schlup v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API