Legal Opinion
Bogan v. Johnson
Court Of Common Pleas Of Ohio
Decided March 10, 2003No. CVC20010126PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John O. CROuse, Judge.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
{¶ 1} The above parties have filed motions for summary judgment addressing numerous issues, all of which point to the ultimate question of whether plaintiffs *20are entitled to UIM coverage under insurance policies issued by defendants. Pursuant to Civ.R. 56, summary judgment is appropriate if it is demonstrated, that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The parties concede and the court finds that there are no issues as to any material fact; thus, this court must determine…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Holliman v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gladys Roberts, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Gladys Roberts, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003