Niesen v. Niesen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The facts on the hearing were stipulated and it is claimed by the defendant the two boys by changing their surnames emancipated themselves and thus he was no longer obligated to support them. The issue might well be stated, whether minors of the age of approximately twenty and eighteen years who legally forsake their father’s name and embrace the surname of their mother’s second husband are entitled to the continued support of their father.
A father’s duty to support his child rests upon not only moral law but legally upon the voluntary status of parenthood which the father assumed. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Codorniz v. CodornizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Brosius v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Green v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Cortina v. CortinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- McManus v. HinneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Johansen v. JohansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Krause v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Bickford v. BickfordNew York Family Court · 1975
- Fuerst v. FuerstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.