Legal Opinion

Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 1935No. Gen. No. 37,941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

On November 12, 1931, plaintiff, -who was employed by defendant as a switchman, was working with his crew assigned to the Stony Island yard of defendant located at Stony Island avenue and 87th street in the cityv of Chicago.

The railroad tracks in this yard ran in a general southeasterly and northwesterly direction. The multiplicity of tracks, buildings, etc., renders it somewhat difficult, notwithstanding a plat offered in evidence, to get an accurate picture of the circumstances under which the accident to plaintiff occurred which is the basis of this suit. A drawing attached to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. People v. MundayIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Grosse v. Terminal RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API