Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
On November 12, 1931, plaintiff, -who was employed by defendant as a switchman, was working with his crew assigned to the Stony Island yard of defendant located at Stony Island avenue and 87th street in the cityv of Chicago.
The railroad tracks in this yard ran in a general southeasterly and northwesterly direction. The multiplicity of tracks, buildings, etc., renders it somewhat difficult, notwithstanding a plat offered in evidence, to get an accurate picture of the circumstances under which the accident to plaintiff occurred which is the basis of this suit. A drawing attached to plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People v. MundayIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Grosse v. Terminal RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940