Legal Opinion

Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,375PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

March 18, 1936, the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Eailroad Company, a corporation, against whom plaintiff had a judgment for $40,000 for personal injuries, filed its motion in the nature of a petition for a writ of error cor am nobis under the provisions of' section 72 of the Civil Practice Act, Ill. State Bar Stats. 1935, ch. 110, If 200; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.072, praying that judgment be vacated and that it be granted a new trial. Plaintiff filed a motion in the nature of a special demurrer to strike defendant’s motion; The motion was Allowed and defendant appeals.

In defendant’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Raub v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Cramer v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Chapman v. North American Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gas & Equipment Company of America v. Clarence F. Carver and La Junta Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. Barton v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Pekelder v. Edgewater Automotive Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. ChristensenIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McNally v. WalkowskiNevada Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API