Legal Opinion

Ecclestone, Moffett & Humphrey, PC v. Ogne, Jinks, Alberts & Stuart, PC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1989No. Docket 95759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In dispute is the distribution of a legal fee earned in an unrelated lawsuit. The two parties, both of which are law firms, claim the lion’s share of the fee. The lower court entered an order on October 6,1986, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition and distributing $41,529.33 of the fee to plaintiff and $25,500 to defendant. MCR 2.116(C)(10). In a second order also entered on October 6, 1986, the lower court awarded costs and attorney fees to plaintiff. MCR 2.405. Defendant appeals, and plaintiff cross appeals, from both orders.

In May of 1982, third-party defendant, Stephen T.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sanders v. Monical MacHinery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Johnston v. Detroit Hoist & Crane Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Medbury v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Plunkett & Cooney, Pc v. Capitol Bancorp LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Reynolds v. PolenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Smolen v. Dahlmann Apartments, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Morris v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. J C Building Corp. v. Parkhurst Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API