Legal Opinion

United States v. Grinnell Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 20, 1969No. 65 Civ. 2486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, District Judge:

Defendants move for partial summary judgment against' the federal government, plaintiff in this action, based on the four-year statute of limitations governing antitrust suits. Clayton Act § 4B, ch. 283, § 1, 69 Stat. 282, 283 (1955), codified in 15 U.S.C. § 15b. They also request leave to amend their answers to accord with their position. . They seek to bar any of plaintiff’s claims which accrued over four years before the filing of the damage action on June 7, 1965. The government’s complaint requests damages dating from April 13, 1957, on the theory that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1973
  3. United States v. PfizerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API