Legal Opinion
AARP v. U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 20, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16–2113 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is [48] AARP's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment in this case. On August 22, 2017, this Court found that EEOC had not provided a reasoned explanation for its decision to promulgate regulations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) ("the Rules") that set particular incentive levels for providing certain medical data to healthcare providers. Mem. Op. [ECF No. 47] at 33. The Rules allowed employer-sponsored wellness plans to offer employees discounts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Elouise Cobell v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. Chevron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Council of Parent Attorneys v. DevosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Nat'l Women's Law Ctr. v. Office of Mgmt. & BudgetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- 35 State Street Hotel Partners, LLC v. GuzmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Bergdahl v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.