Legal Opinion

In Re Karpin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 21, 1993No. 92-570PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent-attorney appeals the recommendation of the Professional Conduct Board that he be disbarred from the practice of law. Respondent claims that (1) his due process rights were violated by allowing Bar Counsel to prosecute the case and participate in the Board’s deliberations, in violation of the doctrine of “internal separation of powers,” (2) the evidence is insufficient to support many of the Board’s key findings, and (3) the recommended sanction is inappropriate. We adopt the recommended sanction.

I

Respondent’s first argument is that his due process rights were violated when the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. In re G.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. In Re O'DeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. In Re Prb Docket No. 2007-046Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. In Re AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API