In Re Karpin
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Per curiam
Respondent-attorney appeals the recommendation of the Professional Conduct Board that he be disbarred from the practice of law. Respondent claims that (1) his due process rights were violated by allowing Bar Counsel to prosecute the case and participate in the Board’s deliberations, in violation of the doctrine of “internal separation of powers,” (2) the evidence is insufficient to support many of the Board’s key findings, and (3) the recommended sanction is inappropriate. We adopt the recommended sanction.
I
Respondent’s first argument is that his due process rights were violated when the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- In re G.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- In Re O'DeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re Prb Docket No. 2007-046Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In Re AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.