Legal Opinion

H. F. Cady Lumber Co. v. Conkling

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1904No. 13,322PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Guy R. 0. Read, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Dueeie, C.

Z. Taylor Turner and son are partners and contractors residing in the city of Omaha. In 1901 said partnership of Turner & Son entered into a contract. with Peter M. Conlding to erect a dwelling house on lot 14, hloclt 3, in Bemis Park, an addition to the city of Omaha. The H. F. Cady Lumber Company furnished certain material entering into the construction of said dwelling house, and on November 7, 1901, and within 60 days from the time of furnishing the last of said material, made out an account in writing of the material so furnished and, after making oath thereto, filed the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Davis v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. First Presbyterian Church of Hutchinson v. L. P. Santy & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. McDonald v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammond Lumber Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Ingersoll v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API