Arcuri v. Kirk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner in this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeks a judgment prohibiting respondents from proceeding to trial on counts one and three of Herkimer County indictment No. 96-33. She asserts that a writ of prohibition should be granted because Herkimer County Court lacks geographic jurisdiction over those counts {see generally, Matter of Steingut v Gold, 42 NY2d 311). Petitioner does not challenge count five of the indictment, which alleges that petitioner sold drugs in Herkimer County on January 23, 1996.
Petitioner was charged in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. PilgrimNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SosnikNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Van Wie v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. RaucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Prospect v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Santorelli v. CowheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.