Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Sosnik

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be modified in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

Defendants are chiropractors, maintaining individual practices in the metropolitan New York area, who allegedly conspired with an attorney named Kramer and his associates to defraud insurance companies by fabricating the injuries and treatment of accident victims. The facts of the scheme are set more fully in People v Ribowsky (77 NY2d 284 [decided today]). As a result of this conduct, defendants were convicted of conspiracy in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. HetenyiNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. People v. LeisnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. HetenyiNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Arcuri v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Van Wie v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Faraci v. FiretogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API