Legal Opinion
Fields v. Othon
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 27, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The petitioners, Charles G. Fields and Calliope G. Fields, husband and wife, bring this suit against the purchaser of their real estate at execution sale, to remove the cloud on their title resulting from that sale, and in the alternative to redeem from it. The bill alleges the following facts. Each of the petitioners owned a parcel of land in Brockton. Calliope G. Fields mortgaged her parcel to one Paraskis to secure her promissory note for $3,500, which was indorsed by her husband, Charles G. Fields. Paraskis brought an action on the note against both petitioners, and attached their real…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Finlay v. Eastern Racing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Reynolds v. GrowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Stretch v. TimiltyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. DeCotisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Reynolds v. Board of Appeal of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Fields v. ParaskisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.