Legal Opinion

Fields v. Paraskis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The defendants in this bill in equity, after an adverse final decree entered on April 25, 1945, from which they appealed, and a “finding of material facts” containing nearly seven hundred words which was filed on the same day and apparently was voluntary (Birnbaum v. Pamoukis, 301 Mass. 559; Jose v. Lyman, 316 Mass. 271, 277; Turner v. Morson, 316 Mass. 678; Jerome v. Eastern Finance Corp. 317 Mass. 364, 365), for the only request for a report of material facts under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 23, was one filed before the entry of the final decree instead of “within four days after . . . [a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Jose v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sodones v. SodonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Walsh v. Atlantic Research Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Vergnani v. VergnaniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Kobrosky v. CrystalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API