Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Grow
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 4, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is a bill in which the plaintiffs seek to establish the amount due them under a contract entered into with the defendants Grow, Conley and Stoneman, relating to the construction of a country club in Weston, and to reach and apply in payment certain property of the defendants alleged to have been conveyed in fraud of creditors. The three defendants named are now the only parties defendant.
A cross bill was filed alleging breaches of the contract by the plaintiffs resulting in damages which the defendants *580sought to recover. The master’s report states that the defendants alleged in amendment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Parker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Case v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Perry v. PyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Crocker v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carleton & Hovey Co. v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Finlay v. Eastern Racing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- In re UlmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.