Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Burns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1923No. 13422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This proceeding was instituted for the disbarment of J. W. Rums, and Hon. R. J. Ray wa-s appointed referee with authority to compel the attendance of witnesses, to take testimony, and report the testimony, together with findings of fact and conclusions of law, to the .Supreme Court.

The matter is now before .the court upon motion to confirm report of the referee and exceptions of the said J. W. Burns thereto. The referee reported on 14 specific charges, and as to seven of the charges found that the same -were not sustained by the proof, and, in view of our holding as to -the other charges, we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re SittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warkentin v. KleinwachterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API