Chavez v. Markham
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gernon, J.:
Michael Markham sued three parties, including Carlos Chavez, for injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident. After all claims were settled prior to trial, Markham filed a motion for attorney fees from Chavez, pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 60-2006. The district court denied Markham’s motion on the ground that his total claim against all defendants in the case exceeded the statutory maximum of $7,500. Markham appeals that decision.
This lawsuit was previously before the Court of Appeals as Markham v. Chavez, No. 68,048, unpublished opinion filed January 8, 1993. The issue in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pinkerton v. SchwiethaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- James v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Darnall v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Robison v. CastelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- In re T.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Pretty Prairie Wind v. Reno CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022