Legal Opinion

Nicholas Demisay v. Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 12, 1991No. 1051, Docket 90-7894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

In Local 50, Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. Local 3, Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, AFL-CIO, 733 F.2d 229 (2d Cir.1984), we held that one union’s health benefits trust fund was required to transfer certain monies to another union’s health benefits trust fund when all the employees of an employer had shifted their union allegiance from one union local to another. Today, we must revisit that problem in a slightly different context, where an employer leaves one set of multi-employer trust funds in favor of a different set of trust funds.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund v. DemisaySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Helen Phillips v. Alaska Hotel And Restaurant Employees Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Phillips v. Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. KearseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  5. Devito v. Hempstead China Shop, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API