Phillips v. Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
We consider here whether a pension plan that excludes a high number of participants from vesting violates the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). In particular, we consider whether the maintenance of restrictive vesting standards amounts to arbitrary and capricious conduct or creates a structural defect under § 302(c)(5) of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5).
The Alaska Hotel and Restaurant Employees Pension Fund (the Fund) appeals a judgment that it violated the LMRA by failing to adopt vesting standards that would have allowed a greater number of participants…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sweatman v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Taft v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.