Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiffs Herbert Curtis and Fay-dell Curtis, husband and wife, prior to February 11, 1939, lived on Marquette avenue in the city of Muskegon. At one time they owned a wick-type kerosene stove with a stand. They disposed of this stove but retained the stand. In November of 1938, Mrs. Curtis purchased from defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company at their store in Muskegon a two-burner Mascot wicldess oil stove. This stove was manufactured by A. J. Lindemann & Hoverson Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, from whom it was purchased by defendant to be sold at retail. The stove was delivered to Mrs.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Robinson v. Charles Wright & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Redmond v. Delta Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Higdon v. CarlebachMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Harrison v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Moyers v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Ford Motor Co. v. Bradley Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
- Gimino v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.