Legal Opinion

Gimino v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 42,665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

On February 11, 1939, plaintiff owned a six-room house on Marquette avenue near the Muskegon city limits, which was rented to and occupied by Herbert Curtis and wife. On that date the house and contents were destroyed by fire, alleged to have been caused by the explosion of a kerosene stove which the tenants had purchased from defendant’s store in Muskegon. Plaintiff sued to recover the value of the house, alleging in substance that defendant was negligent in failing properly to inspect and repair said stove, which had twice been returned to its store for repairs; and that such negligence was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pesavento v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. Peterman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moyers v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Williams v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API