People v. Morrison
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
In this case the defendant is charged with having failed to provide for his minor child under section 270 of the Penal Code of California. He was found guilty and from the judgment and sentence thereafter pronounced he appeals.
The first ground relied upon for reversal is alibi and certain alleged erroneous instructions given by the court concerning the date upon which appellant maintains the prosecution must prove that the child was conceived.
[1] The prosecutrix, Marie L. Mooney, testified that she had sexual intercourse with the defendant in San Diego on the twentieth day of January, 1920,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. HoosierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. ElgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. EppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Patterson v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.