Legal Opinion

In Re Rothwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 2008No. D051584PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IRION, J.

On petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Erin Rothwell argues that California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the Department) violated his constitutional rights when it imposed an administrative sanction against him that included the loss of 151 days of good conduct credits for possessing a controlled substance. Rothwell contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the sanction, as the substance at issue (0.14 grams of heroin concealed on a postcard addressed to Rothwell) was never in his possession, but was instead intercepted by a guard working in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. In re FratusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. (HC) Griffin v. FoulkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Thigpen v. MartelDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. In re GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API