Legal Opinion

(HC) Thigpen v. Martel

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 9, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01001Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON THIGPEN, No. 2:19-cv-01001 KJM GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 M. MARTEL, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Introduction and Summary 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). 22 In this case, conceding that he was guilty of possession of marijuana, petitioner contests 23…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API