Legal Opinion

Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 2001No. 98-101 LPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

Plaintiffs are California water users who claim that their contractually-conferred right to the use of .water was taken from them when the federal government imposed water use restrictions under the Endangered Species Act. They now seek Fifth Amendment compensation for their alleged loss. The case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment as to liability. The issues have been fully briefed, and oral argument was heard on March 20, 2001. We now rule in favor of plaintiffs, and deny the government’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

FACTS

This…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Allegretti & Co. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API