State v. Woodall
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
Russell Woodall, Rocky Brantner, Patricia Lenoir, Mary Charpentier, and James Jackson appeal1 their convictions for possession of a controlled substance.2 We affirm.
Defendants appeal their controlled substance convictions alleging failure to suppress evidence, a violation of CrR 3.3, and failure timely to identify an informant.
Based on the information supplied by an informant, Klickitat County Sheriffs officers obtained warrants to search Mr. Woodall's residence and the Shifters' Motorcycle Clubhouse in Klickitat. Because the officers believed between 8 and 10 people were conducting a drug…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WoodallWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AmezolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.