State v. Woodall
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.
Petitioners were convicted of possession of a controlled substance. Their convictions were based solely on evidence seized under the authority of two search warrants. Petitioners appealed their convictions contending the affidavits given by the police officer in requesting the search warrants were insufficient in that they did not establish the credibility of the officer's informant. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, holding the affidavits were adequate. State v. Woodall, 32 Wn. App. 407, 647 P.2d 1051 (1982). We reverse. Due to our disposition of this issue, we need not address…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HuftWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.