Legal Opinion
Egolf v. Witmer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 22, 2008No. 06-2193PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Tristan Egolf, Benjamin Keely, Jonathan Kohler, David O’Bryant, and Adam Willard claimed that several state and municipal actors violated their First and Fourth Amendment rights by arresting them during a demonstration against the war in Iraq.1 The District Court granted summary judgment for the police on all claims and denied appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment on the First and Fourth Amendment claims. We will affirm the District Court’s holding regarding the Trooper’s motion for summary judgment on their qualified immunity…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gilles v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Barna v. City of Perth AmboyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Julie Peffer v. Mike StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Montanez v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Walter v. Pike County, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Anthony Favata v. Kevin SeidelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.