Legal Opinion

In re Eaton Vance Corp. Securities Litigation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 16, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-10911-EFHPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

This case involves allegations that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing false and misleading registration statements in connection with four separate investment funds. Now pending before this Court is the named plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The named plaintiffs seek to represent a class of investors who purchased shares in all four funds between May 25,1998 and March 5, 2001. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part, and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The defendants in this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  3. In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  4. Swack v. Credit Suisse First BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. Stegall v. LadnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API