Legal Opinion
Swack v. Credit Suisse First Boston
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 14, 2005No. Civ.A. 02-11943-DPWPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*252 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
W00DL0CK, District Judge.
In this putative class action litigation, plaintiff Terry Swack (“Swack”) alleges that defendants Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (“CSFB”) and its analyst Mark Wolfenberger (‘Wolfenberger”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10-b, by issuing intentionally false and misleading research reports regarding Ra-zorfish, Inc. (“Razorfish”). Specifically, Swack alleges that the Defendants issued overly optimistic reports regarding…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.