Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koapke v. Herfendal

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. 20020177Published

1DissentMaring, Justice

[¶ 30] We have not had previous occasion to consider whether a physician who develops a treatment plan for a patient, which includes a referral for specific surgery and a return for completion of the treatment plan, owes a duty of informed consent to that patient.

[¶ 31] As the majority points out, a number of jurisdictions have concluded that a referring physician, who does not have an agency relationship with the surgeon; who does not participate in the surgery or treatment; or who does not retain any control over the treatment, does not have a duty to obtain a patient’s informed consent. I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shkolnik v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Stovall v. HarmsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. O'NEAL v. HammerHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Herrara v. ATLANTIC CITY SURG. GP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Kashkin v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API