Koapke v. Herfendal
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMaring, Justice
[¶ 30] We have not had previous occasion to consider whether a physician who develops a treatment plan for a patient, which includes a referral for specific surgery and a return for completion of the treatment plan, owes a duty of informed consent to that patient.
[¶ 31] As the majority points out, a number of jurisdictions have concluded that a referring physician, who does not have an agency relationship with the surgeon; who does not participate in the surgery or treatment; or who does not retain any control over the treatment, does not have a duty to obtain a patient’s informed consent. I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shkolnik v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Stovall v. HarmsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- O'NEAL v. HammerHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Herrara v. ATLANTIC CITY SURG. GP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Kashkin v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1989