Legal Opinion

Theisen v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1946No. 4473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the District Court of Andrews County.

G. W. Theisen and I. V. Daniels, who will be called plaintiffs, sued the Stanolind Oil & Gas Company and a large number of other interested parties, all of whom will be referred to as defendants, to establish a vacancy claimed by the plaintiffs to exist between the west and south lines of Block 12, University of Texas, and the adjoining Public School Blocks, and between University Blocks 13 and 14 and the Public School Blocks north and west of such University Blocks and between the most southerly north line of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Short v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Theisen v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hogue v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Fitzgerald v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dunn v. WingTexas Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muro v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Wheeler v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Carmichall v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Watts v. Alco Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API