Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Theisen v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1928No. 4635PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Relator George W. Theisen invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to secure a mandamus requiring the Commissioner of the General Land Office to issue to him a permit conferring on him the exclusive right to prospect for and develop the petroleum and natural gas upon and within 2560 acres of University land in Crane County.

The facts, plead and admitted, disclose that relator has complied with the requirements of the Act of 1917, authorizing the issuance of oil and gas permits on University and other public lands, under an application filed on the 29th day of March, 1926. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ehlinger v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Mumme v. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. J. M. Huber Corporation v. William Harvey Denman and Jay Pumphrey, Trustees of the Estate of S. B. Burnett, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Short v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Group No. 1 Oil Corp. v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API